From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:04:12 -0500 Message-ID: <15818A64-FB8E-4352-A270-23D3DB5A0EEF@gnu.org> References: <877j6v3vlc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142503552 8520 80.91.229.2 (16 Mar 2006 10:05:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 16 11:05:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJpMR-0003JN-OW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 11:05:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJpMQ-00036R-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:05:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FJpM1-00031w-1q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:05:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FJpLw-0002wB-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FJpLw-0002ve-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [63.240.77.81] (helo=sccrmhc11.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FJpPh-0001OJ-5S; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:09:01 -0500 Original-Received: from raeburn.org (c-65-96-168-237.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[65.96.168.237]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060316100413011002pbsve>; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:04:13 +0000 Original-Received: from [18.101.0.231] (fwoosh.raeburn.org [18.101.0.231]) by raeburn.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2GA4D0O023006; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:04:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877j6v3vlc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Original-To: Chong Yidong X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51698 Archived-At: > I just noticed that when Emacs is compiled with DENABLE_CHECKING, the > following warning message pops up: > > emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1338624 bytes needed) > 8912 pure bytes used > > (There is no problem if one compiles without DENABLE_CHECKING). That's a bit surprising ... I wasn't aware that ENABLE_CHECKING controlled any code that would influence the amount of pure lisp storage used. It mainly enables the assertion checks done in the XCONS/XSTRING/XSYMBOL/etc macros and elsewhere. In fact, I'd argue that if ENABLE_CHECKING is changing the amount of pure Lisp storage used, it's probably a bug. Ken