* pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING
@ 2006-03-16 3:41 Chong Yidong
2006-03-16 3:52 ` Miles Bader
2006-03-16 10:04 ` Ken Raeburn
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chong Yidong @ 2006-03-16 3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
I just noticed that when Emacs is compiled with DENABLE_CHECKING, the
following warning message pops up:
emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1338624 bytes needed)
8912 pure bytes used
(There is no problem if one compiles without DENABLE_CHECKING).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING
2006-03-16 3:41 pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING Chong Yidong
@ 2006-03-16 3:52 ` Miles Bader
2006-03-16 4:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-16 10:04 ` Ken Raeburn
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miles Bader @ 2006-03-16 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:
> I just noticed that when Emacs is compiled with DENABLE_CHECKING, the
> following warning message pops up:
>
> emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1338624 bytes needed)
> 8912 pure bytes used
I have to bump pure-space on my personal branch too, so it seems that
the value on the trunk is quite close to overflowing.
-Miles
--
We are all lying in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
-Oscar Wilde
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING
2006-03-16 3:52 ` Miles Bader
@ 2006-03-16 4:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2006-03-16 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: cyd, emacs-devel
> From: Miles Bader <miles.bader@necel.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:52:19 +0900
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> writes:
> > I just noticed that when Emacs is compiled with DENABLE_CHECKING, the
> > following warning message pops up:
> >
> > emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1338624 bytes needed)
> > 8912 pure bytes used
>
> I have to bump pure-space on my personal branch too, so it seems that
> the value on the trunk is quite close to overflowing.
Not necessarily. This could be solved by having ENABLE_CHECKING and
your branch increase pure storage size.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING
2006-03-16 3:41 pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING Chong Yidong
2006-03-16 3:52 ` Miles Bader
@ 2006-03-16 10:04 ` Ken Raeburn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ken Raeburn @ 2006-03-16 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: emacs-devel
> I just noticed that when Emacs is compiled with DENABLE_CHECKING, the
> following warning message pops up:
>
> emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 1338624 bytes needed)
> 8912 pure bytes used
>
> (There is no problem if one compiles without DENABLE_CHECKING).
That's a bit surprising ... I wasn't aware that ENABLE_CHECKING
controlled any code that would influence the amount of pure lisp
storage used. It mainly enables the assertion checks done in the
XCONS/XSTRING/XSYMBOL/etc macros and elsewhere. In fact, I'd argue
that if ENABLE_CHECKING is changing the amount of pure Lisp storage
used, it's probably a bug.
Ken
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-16 10:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-16 3:41 pure storage overflow with DENABLE_CHECKING Chong Yidong
2006-03-16 3:52 ` Miles Bader
2006-03-16 4:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-03-16 10:04 ` Ken Raeburn
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).