From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Konstantin Kharlamov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] lisp/progmodes/etags.el don't (forward-char) as it's overriden next line Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:45:10 +0300 Message-ID: <1552945510.7027.2@yandex.ru> References: <20190316015314.2335-1-Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> <20190316015314.2335-2-Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="241450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 18 22:45:34 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h604a-0010gm-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:45:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47974 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h604Y-00043d-V0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h604N-00041w-Qw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h604N-0001K4-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from forward103j.mail.yandex.net ([5.45.198.246]:56262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h604J-0001G2-8G; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mxback2j.mail.yandex.net (mxback2j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::10b]) by forward103j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 988286740411; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:45:11 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp4j.mail.yandex.net (smtp4j.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1619::15:6]) by mxback2j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id mK60JIAPHe-jBMWBfth; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:45:11 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1552945511; bh=mgd+6vTe87Ws5dZf4zVmYeKQJbWL58BT5md/YjRl5+8=; h=In-Reply-To:Cc:To:Subject:From:References:Date:Message-Id; b=NTYq8/ko2iSGQOPRPwyyIsOXm/hkFf0qml5wDbWcEfA3BxCZ2VJSUkWe6gAztnsWY ku49czThy1WxlbgZQ+Hyq9vTtV2mCQZGEO7CJEiRy8dSoB2K8b7GWOWM4L5u9NiqBe 5aUtVfDOdrOfmr8YUannhnZq2tlzZnuGNcsW/3lU= Authentication-Results: mxback2j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Original-Received: by smtp4j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id F2phTmeNSE-jAJSAHfY; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:45:10 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) In-Reply-To: <83k1gwueef.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: geary/master~g91967edc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.45.198.246 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234342 Archived-At: =F7 =F0=CE, =CD=C1=D2 18, 2019 at 11:16 =F0=F0 (PM), Eli Zaretskii=20 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC: >> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:15:27 +0300 >> From: Konstantin Kharlamov >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >>=20 >> > Can you provide those additional details? >>=20 >> I'm not sure what additional details you want. >=20 > OK, let me ask more specific questions: >=20 > 1. Why was the amount of whitespace in the tags table different from > that in the source file? It's a bug in anjuta-tags > 2. What command(s) was/were used to produce the tags table? anjuta-tags -e file.vala > 3. Why are the issue and you talking about "trailing whitespace", > while the difference between Expected and Actual in the issue is > in leading whitespace, not trailing whitespace? Sorry for confusion here, I was imagining: given a string, whitespace=20 may "trail" on both sides of it. But I'm not a native speaker. >> Let's make it the other way around: please, provide any language >> example, where having the trailing space may be significant for >> unambigiously determining the tag. >=20 > etags.el doesn't understand any languages, that is the job of the > program that produces the tags table. etags.el just follows the rules > for the format of tags in the tags table. I don't know about trailing > whitespace, but tags for HTML files surely include embedded > whitespace, for example. >=20 > So once again, I suggest to focus on the particular problem you had, > because I'd like to find a solution for that without making > backward-incompatible changes in behavior of etags.el. Okay, whatever. I get your position. Though I disagree, but we clearly=20 have different priorities here: while I'm focusing on a Emacs user,=20 you're focusing on technical correctness. I doubt this discussion can=20 move anywhere further, let's leave it at it. Can my 1-st patch from the series be merged though? Thanks. =