From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Konstantin Kharlamov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:23:53 +0300 Message-ID: <1552829033.21432.1@yandex.ru> References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="42904"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Philippe Vaucher , emacs-devel To: Tadeus Prastowo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 17 14:25:05 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Vmj-000B34-99 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:25:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55711 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Vmi-000056-8D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Vlh-0008VM-Ds for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Vlg-00058e-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from forward106o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.187]:55214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h5Vlf-00056L-GY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 09:24:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mxback9g.mail.yandex.net (mxback9g.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:170]) by forward106o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B381F5060239; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:23:55 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp3o.mail.yandex.net (smtp3o.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::27]) by mxback9g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id B6vsJfBsSP-NtVWMwiX; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:23:55 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1552829035; bh=JGhHTKAEtitzFNZhA7IABlfPez1gEFdDQXzAs67K4X8=; h=In-Reply-To:Cc:To:Subject:From:References:Date:Message-Id; b=hvJGWFtrF9Sx4B41Rmbgku1ixJXZV1Zrkok45fCISBnMxI7jNri0ivZjI02UJXj1q H9rfDZr7kAkdX2YwB2a3Z29SUmuzjpG/JVtkkI4JF6vsJz5tUI0icfJE2XOuhIQYOz 7M5vi5l82P8TKcWKpRi5VnaqFnwmvaKq3ltcyLR0= Authentication-Results: mxback9g.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Original-Received: by smtp3o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id YpdURLrYEn-NsguP1d7; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:23:54 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: geary/master~g91967edc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 37.140.190.187 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234265 Archived-At: =C2 =C2=F1, =EC=E0=F0 17, 2019 at 4:14 =CF=CF (PM), Tadeus Prastowo=20 =ED=E0=EF=E8=F1=E0=EB: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 1:54 PM Philippe Vaucher > wrote: >> Now, the Emacs model is similar to the linux kernel dev & the git=20 >> dev workflow, so obviously "it works fine" and has advantages too,=20 >> but personally I think those are outweighted by the the=20 >> disadvantages (or rather than the contribution experience is much=20 >> nicer with gitlab). >=20 > IMO, I feel more comfortable with the current Emacs model because I > see less noise in the interface. Furthermore, the current model > allows me to do my own way of automation against a stable simple > interface (plain-text e-mails and textual command lines have been > around for a long time). This may not be welcoming to newcomers, but > I once was a newcomer in the Linux kernel dev but found nothing so > difficult about it. The automation sounds a bit abstract, but I guess you still can do it=20 if gitlab have enabled replying/opening of merge requests through mails. Also, Linux kernel and git has "patchwork" site that essentially tracks=20 open patch-series, versions of patches, comments to them, allows to=20 download latest series=85 It is more advanced than just the mailing=20 list as GNU Emacs has. =