From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Massive changes in configury Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:02:40 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <1483-Mon15Apr2002210239+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018894163 20786 127.0.0.1 (15 Apr 2002 18:09:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16xAup-0005P9-00 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:09:23 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16xBCe-00032R-00 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:27:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xAuk-0001OV-00; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:09:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mirapoint.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.20]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16xAtv-0001Ku-00 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretsky (diup-219-133.inter.net.il [213.8.219.133]) by mirapoint.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2) with ESMTP id ABE13305; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:08:22 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: schwab@suse.de X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:47:13 +0200) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2640 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2640 > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:47:13 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > |> Can we please discuss these changes before they are made? > > Sorry, I didn't expect objections. I didn't say I objected (I don't), I just wanted to understand what is going on. I see that you removed defines related to alloca and the stack direction. Are there any others?