From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jostein=20Kj=F8nigsen?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regarding performance issues with the Emacs 25.1 Windows-build Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:13:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1478891632.858581.784998817.60268BBF@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1478680445.2214391.782069929.51F43E52@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83shr0fwsu.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa1ofu6u.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8d7f0uo.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: jostein@kjonigsen.net NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478891678 16972 195.159.176.226 (11 Nov 2016 19:14:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jostein@kjonigsen.net, Noam Postavsky To: Phillip Lord , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 11 20:14:32 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5HH6-0000Pn-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:14:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5HH7-0005TF-M3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:14:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5HGx-0005S7-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:14:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5HGw-0003p3-DX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:13:59 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:57036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c5HGs-0003kp-HC; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:13:54 -0500 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944E320685; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:13:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:13:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= secure.kjonigsen.net; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=TMDWpXzP7GA/b/9QHOMYfDPlqZc=; b=osy/Cn Q0iXEd8hORgNgOsuptj8XVOVue7jChnuAkOienp2poC6gcrESnboupOOcjdaJ0u8 bO6M8/1PuRgbhgll5QfmWdBnPyFqKe7ourpxI0gZ8KzPq8ZtmesjHI4FIKzBx8rY BE61Qmk2fiys+8Ta4zqviDFleqJR+WEzF+vc8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= smtpout; bh=TMDWpXzP7GA/b/9QHOMYfDPlqZc=; b=KZZTuby43MEUe4duPIUu 6oaO3sCSoGBN5uBsdH0GbIwaRoibWJpA0lnhyFURMudbelQWgqPH5PxghZy4wuEI Fj50q5oFmxpeX8OKisgcD+haAEiY5iz/m6Lu7rOx92LzqCwenHFWDlt6IEff4Zw8 vo3jtIeGMnCu0C86+/oHDaQ= X-ME-Sender: Original-Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5E1CD9EE16; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:13:52 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d68eb56e In-Reply-To: <87a8d7f0uo.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209346 Archived-At: So far this all sounds great. Good job everyone! :) That said: I'm a Windows-user at work and Linux-user at home and today I just wasn't in at the office. I could try it out in a virtual machine on my laptop at home right now, but I'd much rather try it on my regular work-station, with my regular config and where I know what to expect performance and responsiveness-wise. That means I won't be able to test this until monday. Hopefully that won't be a problem? I mean... So far 25.1 has been out for almost 2 months, so if 25.1.2 gets delayed a few days, probably won't hurt that much? -- Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen =F0=9F=A5=93 jostein@kjonigsen.net / jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net / jostein@gmail.com https://jostein.kjonigsen.net On Thu, Nov 10, 2016, at 11:04 PM, Phillip Lord wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: >>> In GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) >>> of 2015-04-11 on LEG570 >>> Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.3.9600 >>> Configured using: >>> `configure --prefix=3D/c/usr --host=3Di686-pc-mingw32' >>=20 >> That could indeed be the culprit: omitting -O2 makes Emacs 2 to 3 >> times slower, IME. >>=20 >> Phillip, could you please double-check the value of CFLAGS in the >> Makefiles in your build tree?=C2=A0 Does it include any optimization >> options? >=20 >=20 > I've rebuilt using -O2 explicitly in CFLAGS and put it here: >=20 > http://www.russet.org.uk/scratch/ >=20 > Using the benchmarks on the reddit link, it does make Emacs > significantly faster. >=20 > @Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen could you give these a go and let me know of your > experiences. >=20 > @Eli assuming that these binaries address the issue what do I do with > the version number in uploading them to ftp.gnu.org. I don't want to > over-write the existing ones, nor use the same version number. >=20 > Apologies all for these difficulties. >=20 > Phil