On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr> wrote:
Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg@gmail.com> writes: Hi Simen,
Ah, sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant was that it could guarantee to return the *first* non-nil value that resulted from applying the predicate, like in CL. So for instance, (seq-some #'1+ '(1 3 5)) could guarantee to return 2, not 4 or 6.
[...] Or did you mean that the documentation of `seq-some' should state that `seq-some' returns the first non-nil value? Cheers, Nico

Yes, that's what I meant.

-- Simen