On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr> 
wrote:
> Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> Hi Simen,
> 
>>  Ah, sorry, I should have been clearer. What I meant was that it 
>> could
>>  guarantee to return the *first* non-nil value that resulted from
>>  applying the predicate, like in CL.
>> 
>>  So for instance, (seq-some #'1+ '(1 3 5)) could guarantee to return 
>> 2,
>>  not 4 or 6.
> 
> [...]
> Or did you mean that the documentation of `seq-some' should state that
> `seq-some' returns the first non-nil value?
> 
> Cheers,
> Nico

Yes, that's what I meant.

-- Simen