From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: leim build bug
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:04:56 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <1438-Sat26Oct2002170456+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <E1854DX-0006GK-00@pot.cnuce.cnr.it>
 <200210251333.WAA20177@etlken.m17n.org> <E1854fY-0007Ek-00@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> <7263-Sat26Oct2002102327+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <E185Qux-0001G4-00@pot.cnuce.cnr.it>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035644606 14417 80.91.224.249 (26 Oct 2002 15:03:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:03:26 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 185STF-0003kO-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:03:25 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 185SWR-0003Sw-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:06:43 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185SU3-0006PK-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:04:15 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185STD-0005iF-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:03:23 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 185STA-0005ht-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:03:22 -0400
Original-Received: from balder.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.15])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 185STA-0005hb-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:03:20 -0400
Original-Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.194.241])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA)
	with ESMTP id BWT17840;
	Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:03:12 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: pot@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <E185Qux-0001G4-00@pot.cnuce.cnr.it> (message from Francesco
	Potorti` on Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:23:55 +0200)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8804
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8804

> From: Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:23:55 +0200
> 
> > I disagree.  What you found out was unchanged since Emacs 20.1, and I
> > don't think I've ever heard any complaints.  
> 
> Well, you've just heard one :-)

Yes ;-)

> Would it be difficult or anyway problematic to merge emacs and leim
> starting with 21.3 instead?

I don't recommend making any significant changes like this one on the
branch, but if others think it's worthwhile, I won't object.