From: A Soare <alinsoar@voila.fr>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: - c-end-of-defun - !
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:36:22 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14139684.372931176924982833.JavaMail.www@wwinf4101> (raw)
Shell I do the patch tomorrow? Or it has already been done?
A Soare.
> Message du 18/04/07 à 20h38
> De : "Alan Mackenzie" <acm@muc.de>
> A : "A Soare" <alinsoar@voila.fr>, "Andreas Schwab" <schwab@suse.de>
> Copie à : "Chong Yidong" <cyd@stupidchicken.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org
> Objet : Re: - c-end-of-defun - !
>
> 'evening, Alin and Andreas!
>
> Thank you both very much for reporting this bug! (Andreas: the bug you
> reported 2 hours after Alin is the same bug.)
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 03:17:00PM +0200, A Soare wrote:
> >
> > int
> > function (void)
> > {
> > int b;
> >
> > }
>
> > struct ONE function (void)
> > {
> > int a;
> >
> > }
>
> > struct
> > TWO function (void)
> > {
> > int a;
> >
> > }
>
> >
> > Here are 3 valid functions written in C.
> > Copy them into a buffer in C-MODE, and eval (end-of defun) in the first one and in the second.
>
> > In the second case => FAIL.
>
> > That is because of this code in c-end-of-defun:
> >
> > ;; Do we need to move forward from the brace to the semicolon?
> > (when (eq arg 0)
> > (if (c-in-function-trailer-p) ; after "}" of struct/enum, etc.
> > (c-syntactic-re-search-forward ";"))
>
> > (c-in-function-trailer-p) in our case MUST return NULL. Not the (point).
>
> This is indeed the case.
>
> > Is really need to call (c-syntactic-re-search-forward ";") here?
>
> Yes. c-end-of-defun is being fooled by the "struct" in the functions'
> return types into thinking the function is actually a struct declaration
> like this:
>
> struct foo {
> int bar ;
> int baz ;
> } blorg ;
>
> A struct also counts as a defun, and it ends at the first semicolon
> following the brace (as contrasted with a function, which ends at the
> brace). This is what the (c-syntactic-re-search-forward ";") is for.
>
> The solution is to analyse the defuns' headers more thoroughly. It
> shouldn't be too hard, and shouldn't take too long.
>
> > Alin Soare.
>
> --
> Alan Mackenzie (Ittersbach, Germany)
>
>
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-18 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-18 19:36 A Soare [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-18 13:17 - c-end-of-defun - ! A Soare
2007-04-18 18:38 ` Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14139684.372931176924982833.JavaMail.www@wwinf4101 \
--to=alinsoar@voila.fr \
--cc=acm@muc.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).