From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jorge Araya Navarro Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is intellisense features integration in Emacs technically possible? Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 01:39:02 -0600 Message-ID: <1390376342.14531.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: Reply-To: elcorreo@deshackra.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-ptBMZmenETJWBR/PwfPW" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390376357 26687 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2014 07:39:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:39:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 08:39:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5sPD-0002cS-Kr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:39:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5sPD-0005zC-2c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 02:39:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5sP2-0005z2-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 02:39:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5sOx-0005Ll-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 02:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from shared.dohost.us ([188.165.91.212]:39386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5sOx-0005LQ-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 02:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [186.176.239.70] (port=42504 helo=[192.168.0.110]) by shared.dohost.us with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1W5sRZ-0007oY-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:41:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.3 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - shared.dohost.us X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - deshackra.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: shared.dohost.us: authenticated_id: elcorreo@deshackra.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 188.165.91.212 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168873 Archived-At: --=-ptBMZmenETJWBR/PwfPW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit El mar, 21-01-2014 a las 23:02 -0500, emacs-devel-request@gnu.org escribió: > From: Eli Zaretskii > > From: Tom > > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC) > > > > David Engster randomsample.de> writes: > > > > > For Java? Never, unless someone seriously starts working on it. However, > > > your statement that it is futile in the first place will surely not > > > attract anybody, so please don't make such claims. > > > > My point was that much more can be gained with much less work by > > working on interface packages than natively reimplementing these > > features. > > And even more will be gained by using Visual Studio instead of Emacs, > but so what? > > Like David points out: a lot of required infrastructure already > exists, so this is doable, given enough motivation. It's not an > unthinkable effort. Well, I started to learn elisp today! :D. Ok, that may not be so useful for the size of the task, but I have to start in some place, right? -- Pax et bonum. Jorge Araya Navarro. Diseñador publicitario, programador Python/C++ y colaborador en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre. --=-ptBMZmenETJWBR/PwfPW Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit El mar, 21-01-2014 a las 23:02 -0500, emacs-devel-request@gnu.org escribió: 
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> From: Tom <adatgyujto@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
> 
> David Engster <deng <at> randomsample.de> writes:
>  
> > For Java? Never, unless someone seriously starts working on it. However,
> > your statement that it is futile in the first place will surely not
> > attract anybody, so please don't make such claims.
> 
> My point was that much more can be gained with much less work by
> working on interface packages than natively reimplementing these
> features.

And even more will be gained by using Visual Studio instead of Emacs,
but so what?

Like David points out: a lot of required infrastructure already
exists, so this is doable, given enough motivation.  It's not an
unthinkable effort.

Well, I started to learn elisp today! :D. Ok, that may not be so useful for the size of the task, but I have to start in some place, right?

--
Pax et bonum.
Jorge Araya Navarro.
Diseñador publicitario, programador Python/C++ y colaborador en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre.
--=-ptBMZmenETJWBR/PwfPW--