From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Svante Signell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Need help with upstream vs Debian emacs-23.4 build differences Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:58:20 +0200 Organization: Hemma Message-ID: <1341176300.8178.6.camel@x60> References: <1340924981.32095.176.camel@hp.my.own.domain> Reply-To: svante.signell@telia.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341176328 24626 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2012 20:58:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 20:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 01 22:58:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SlREE-0006gM-5p for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:58:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41692 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlRED-0006uU-93 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:58:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlRE6-0006uP-BP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlRE2-0007mk-4d for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:58:37 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:56420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SlRE1-0007me-Qg; Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.64] (78.70.161.98) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u84406617) id 4FD624AF00707042; Sun, 1 Jul 2012 22:58:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 195.67.226.208 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:85609 gmane.emacs.devel:151338 Archived-At: On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 08:49 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Svante Signell writes: > > > eshell/esh-groups.el, calc/calc-loaddefs.el, subdirs.el are the same as > > distributed, but loaddefs.el, cedet/ede/loaddefs.el, > > cedet/semantic/loaddefs.el, cedet/srecode/loaddefs.el are not! > > > > What is triggering the differences, and where can they be found, > > especially the large lisp/loaddefs.el debian/build-?/lisp/loaddefs.el? > > Since you didn't tell what are the differences that is hard to answer. Hi, Did you receive my updated mail? I'm kind of stuck and would really appreciate some kind of idea on how to debug further. Why is this autoloads target creating so different results from the tarball build and the Debian build?