* Re: Google Drive
2012-05-01 17:14 ` Thomas Lord
@ 2012-05-01 17:19 ` Geoffrey Teale
2012-05-01 17:29 ` Thomas Lord
2012-05-01 17:48 ` chad
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geoffrey Teale @ 2012-05-01 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
On 1 May 2012 19:14, Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> wrote:
> Are there any free software packages that
> provide functionality like DropBox or GoogleDrive?
> Are there any companies that sell the utility
> service of hosting that software, with
> freedom-respecting terms of service and security
> features such as optional encryption of stored
> data?
>
> To me it seems like there *should* be lots and lots
> of small businesses doing that at a modest, fair
> price mark-up. And then lots of GNU software, including
> Emacs, should support that functionality.
Ubuntu One has a GPLv3 licensed client. The server code is proprietary
--
Geoff Teale
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Google Drive
2012-05-01 17:19 ` Geoffrey Teale
@ 2012-05-01 17:29 ` Thomas Lord
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lord @ 2012-05-01 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geoffrey Teale; +Cc: emacs-devel
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 19:19 +0200, Geoffrey Teale wrote:
>
> Ubuntu One has a GPLv3 licensed client. The server code is
> proprietary
So, that is not freedom-respecting at all.
Bummer.
This seems like it should be easy money (modest amounts)
for a lot of folks and very valuable. Emacs support
would be awesome, especially if there were a compatible
port of Emacs to javascript and free software browsers.
-t
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Google Drive
2012-05-01 17:14 ` Thomas Lord
2012-05-01 17:19 ` Geoffrey Teale
@ 2012-05-01 17:48 ` chad
2012-05-02 1:13 ` CFP " Thomas Lord
2012-05-02 5:50 ` David Engster
2012-05-02 15:41 ` Tekk
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: chad @ 2012-05-01 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Lord; +Cc: Emacs developers
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 723 bytes --]
On May 1, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Thomas Lord wrote:
> Are there any free software packages that
> provide functionality like DropBox or GoogleDrive?
> Are there any companies that sell the utility
> service of hosting that software, with
> freedom-respecting terms of service and security
> features such as optional encryption of stored
> data?
I know some people at MIT were working on such a thing, based on SUNDR (paper attached), but I'm far enough out of touch that I couldn't tell you if it was going to go anywhere. That group is pro-free-software, but when I last heard, they were primarily concerned with the (frankly terrible) security implications of DropBox, Box.net, MS SkyDrive, et al.
*Chad
[-- Attachment #2: 2011-06-19-sundr.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 212487 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 2 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* CFP Re: Google Drive
2012-05-01 17:48 ` chad
@ 2012-05-02 1:13 ` Thomas Lord
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lord @ 2012-05-02 1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chad; +Cc: Emacs developers
Is there anyone convenient to the East Bay
of (SF Bay Area) who would like to work
on this with me?
There's no need for a first "product" offering
to start with something as fancy and speculative
as SUNDR. We can start with off-the-shelf parts,
conveniently configured, I think. I think it's
OK for users to trust their storage provider
so long as the provider respects the users' freedoms
well enough to merit that trust.
(Since this message suggests a new and separate
project, branching off from an Emacs issue, it
is probably best for those inclined to reply to
reply off-list.)
-t
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:48 -0700, chad wrote:
> On May 1, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Thomas Lord wrote:
>
> > Are there any free software packages that
> > provide functionality like DropBox or GoogleDrive?
> > Are there any companies that sell the utility
> > service of hosting that software, with
> > freedom-respecting terms of service and security
> > features such as optional encryption of stored
> > data?
>
> I know some people at MIT were working on such a thing, based on SUNDR (paper attached), but I'm far enough out of touch that I couldn't tell you if it was going to go anywhere. That group is pro-free-software, but when I last heard, they were primarily concerned with the (frankly terrible) security implications of DropBox, Box.net, MS SkyDrive, et al.
>
> *Chad
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Google Drive
2012-05-01 17:14 ` Thomas Lord
2012-05-01 17:19 ` Geoffrey Teale
2012-05-01 17:48 ` chad
@ 2012-05-02 5:50 ` David Engster
2012-05-02 7:01 ` Lennart Borgman
2012-05-02 15:41 ` Tekk
3 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Engster @ 2012-05-02 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Lord; +Cc: Paul Michael Reilly, chad, emacs-devel
Thomas Lord writes:
> Are there any free software packages that
> provide functionality like DropBox or GoogleDrive?
Last I checked, the most promising approach was
http://sparkleshare.org/
which is based on git and should work with basically any git hosting
provider.
-David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Google Drive
2012-05-02 5:50 ` David Engster
@ 2012-05-02 7:01 ` Lennart Borgman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lennart Borgman @ 2012-05-02 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Lord, chad, Paul Michael Reilly, emacs-devel
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:50 AM, David Engster <deng@randomsample.de> wrote:
> Thomas Lord writes:
>> Are there any free software packages that
>> provide functionality like DropBox or GoogleDrive?
>
> Last I checked, the most promising approach was
>
> http://sparkleshare.org/
>
> which is based on git and should work with basically any git hosting
> provider.
It looks very interesting, but I can't find any documentation about
how it really works. Does it do automatic sync like Dropbox, or?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Google Drive
2012-05-01 17:14 ` Thomas Lord
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-02 5:50 ` David Engster
@ 2012-05-02 15:41 ` Tekk
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tekk @ 2012-05-02 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
On Tue, 01 May 2012 10:14:25 -0700
Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> wrote:
> Are there any free software packages that
> provide functionality like DropBox or GoogleDrive?
> Are there any companies that sell the utility
> service of hosting that software, with
> freedom-respecting terms of service and security
> features such as optional encryption of stored
> data?
>
> To me it seems like there *should* be lots and lots
> of small businesses doing that at a modest, fair
> price mark-up. And then lots of GNU software, including
> Emacs, should support that functionality.
>
> -t
>
>
> On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 10:02 -0700, chad wrote:
> > On May 1, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Paul Michael Reilly wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone started to add support to Emacs so that Google Drive
> > > can be treated as a usable directory? Using dired on a
> > > development instance of Emacs 24 yields the error message:
> > > "Format specifier doesn't match argument type"
> > >
> > > I have to confess that I love the concept of editing some files
> > > on my desktop computer at home, grab my laptop and head to lunch
> > > at some local spot with wifi and continue to work on my documents
> > > WITHOUT having to do anything special, like use Tramp or a source
> > > controlled environment or sshfs, etc. Of course, one has be
> > > aware of privacy settings so that you either make the documents
> > > deliberately public, deliberately private or something in
> > > between.
> >
> > I've been doing this for years with DropBox and no special effort,
> > and I'm surprised that it doesn't Just Work in this case. I just
> > set up Google Drive and it seems to work fine (well, except that
> > most of the documents in it are useless inside emacs).
> >
> > Could you maybe give some more details or file a bug report?
> >
> > *Chad
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
SparkleShare and OwnCloud. SparkleShare is basically a pretty wrapper
around git, OwnCloud is a proper system.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread