From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric M. Ludlam" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with EDE Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1255578358.6961.593.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> References: <87hbun9jbs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <1254397096.16450.84.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <1254575261.6961.23.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <873a5wbed3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8763apttus.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: eric@siege-engine.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255578340 16427 80.91.229.12 (15 Oct 2009 03:45:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sascha Wilde Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 15 05:45:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MyHHM-0007sg-8t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:45:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58204 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MyHHL-0006lp-Fp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MyHHG-0006l4-Vi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MyHHF-0006kD-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52105 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MyHHF-0006kA-ES for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from static-71-184-83-10.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([71.184.83.10]:55534 helo=projectile.siege-engine.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MyHHE-0004oB-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from projectile.siege-engine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by projectile.siege-engine.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id n9F3jxjq000940; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: (from zappo@localhost) by projectile.siege-engine.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9F3jwtA000939; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:58 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: projectile.siege-engine.com: zappo set sender to eric@siege-engine.com using -f In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116156 Archived-At: On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 14:15 +0200, Sascha Wilde wrote: > Chong Yidong wrote: > > Sascha Wilde writes: > > > >> Yet another one: > >> ede-make-dist does not work for ede automake projects: > [...] > > This is a bug in project-make-dist (the filename comparison forgets that > > ede-proj-dist-makefile returns a full filename). I've checked in a fix > > into the trunk. > > Thanks. That fixed it for me! > > And made me discover the next problem: > The generated configure script as packed into the dist tar depends on > Project.ede, but that isn't part of the distribution: > > $ tar xzvf cedettest/ede-test-1.0.tar.gz > $ cd ede-test-1.0 > $ ./configure > configure: error: cannot find sources (Project.ede) in . or .. > > I'm not sure which is the bug, the dependency or that Project.ede is not > distributed... I checked in some changes in the CEDET repository to make this work. I also fixed a problem it had with automake projects with more than one directory level. I hadn't thought to put a test of the "dist" into my test suite. This seems like a good idea. Thanks Eric