From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Collins Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar Repository II Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:59:45 +1100 Message-ID: <1225058385.9015.887.camel@lifeless-64> References: <87skr26cba.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87d4htd2ll.fsf@yahoo.com> <20081022204613.51dbb54f@terra.solaris> <873aios6ap.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <48FF9576.8040401@arbash-meinel.com> <87hc6zuuqk.fsf@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CqFh0a3RMFYScoO3XQ1t" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225058328 27713 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2008 21:58:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Clemente Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Sun Oct 26 22:59:48 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuDeD-0003Wy-KX for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:59:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuDcy-0007Im-VA; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:58:29 +0000 Original-Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.57]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuDcw-0007IF-JY for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:58:26 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcDAJ+DBEk7p/VWgWdsb2JhbACBdpIFAQEWIqpEg08 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,489,1220193000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="234230268" Original-Received: from ppp245-86.static.internode.on.net (HELO lifelesswks.robertcollins.net) ([59.167.245.86]) by ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2008 08:28:22 +1030 Original-Received: from lifeless-65.local ([192.168.1.13] helo=lifeless-64) by lifelesswks.robertcollins.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KuDbW-0004hr-0C; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:56:58 +1100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by lifeless-64 with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KuDeE-0007cw-9x; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:59:46 +1100 In-Reply-To: <87hc6zuuqk.fsf@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-Topics: everythingelse X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:48532 gmane.emacs.devel:105020 Archived-At: --=-CqFh0a3RMFYScoO3XQ1t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Clemente wrote: >=20 > Comparison of =E2=80=9Etime bzr log >/dev/null=E2=80=9C of emacs-merges: >=20 > With repository format: pack-0.92 > log: 4m 20s > log --short: 3m 17s >=20 > With repository format: development2 > log: 3m 4s > log --short: 2m 10s So, a significant improvement. > git: 0m 7s Truely, thats pretty fast. I'd like to know if its outputting the same number of revisions. -Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-CqFh0a3RMFYScoO3XQ1t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBJBOhRhnv5qfvT644RAjNlAKCcSzfVuFtssaer74YdFLZSJa/W/wCfRlaP L08tXtnm83YKZVnMmYS4BEU= =WDI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CqFh0a3RMFYScoO3XQ1t--