From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Simen_Heggest=C3=B8yl?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New feature in project.el: Remembering the previously used projects Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:15:07 +0200 Message-ID: <1224.49584757618$1591211779@news.gmane.org> References: <6f0f6cc9-52f4-8383-9827-ead54e898472@yandex.ru> <87pnan8xuf.fsf@tcd.ie> <8834c5e9-90c7-a8ad-3dcd-b8fb95f99df5@yandex.ru> <87lfl42xul.fsf@tcd.ie> <87mu5kz2tp.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="55122"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel , Dmitry Gutov To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 21:16:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgYs2-000EEj-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:16:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50736 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgYs1-0004Xu-1S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 15:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgYrK-00044B-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 15:15:30 -0400 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:41136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgYrJ-0004Tb-1q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 15:15:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=selector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=R2jUZjTBblJSfWzl9pUYKk8mmqomsbjY/W7+wtjaoXo=; b=dsdIPlgCcysrtpcC6f6O93e+Dl pEZEsDfACr7zME6wLy6KU+ihzD29HuN7aNsxs+fGIhs9e0C3Z0HTiihsIWoWlWLueJ5jkldUrtJFL b380Bqq8nfWQxEHwhMHDZkH+1/YbeiqibUAvaeXalk6nzfdxwfxpV8bjTNeWM+FBBCiCD7t+Xjew3 dzNRcm2Qp/JI3b4ik6svnIOiZHSrzxsyK/RIJ1McYBhmQLAW+IbAIi/HAgrVlyAJdzb2acg31kBXs HoM4pqKn80EqQ8ikB9qma+8ixkqER80gRLnj/lQnxLbwdGNYooDJEGu9PBvzbLacGR+jMdidYixV6 ndxWLayg==; Original-Received: from [10.9.9.74] (helo=submission03.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jgYrD-0000zK-Qo; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:15:24 +0200 Original-Received: by submission03.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (963757)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1jgYqy-0002tb-7C; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:15:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mu5kz2tp.fsf@tcd.ie> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Wed, 03 Jun 2020 14:38:58 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.220.196.211; envelope-from=simenheg@runbox.com; helo=aibo.runbox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/03 15:15:24 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251816 Archived-At: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> On 03.06.2020 14:27, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote: >>> With that in mind, I wonder whether project-switch-commands should use >>> character rather than string keys. Or would that be too limiting? >> >> That would probably make it more compatible to use with read-multiple-choice. >> >> The downsides: a bit less readable for the casual reader, I guess? And if keys a >> strings, the feature could be extended to handle full key sequences, maybe. But >> I'm not sure this is really needed. > > Perhaps read-multiple-choice will be extended to support both one day... I think compatibility with read-multiple-choice outweighs those downsides. Then if read-multiple-choice is extended to support both one day, project-switch-commands can grow with it (after we've changed project-switch-project to use read-multiple-choice). -- Simen