From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Buffers menu question
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:32:55 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <1190-Fri26Apr2002143254+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <871yd6cw8q.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
	<200204241755.g3OHtgQ03421@aztec.santafe.edu> <buod6wo1jkc.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019820990 25819 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2002 11:36:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:36:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17141e-0006iK-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:36:30 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17144G-0006kR-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:39:13 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17141b-0002UB-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:36:27 -0400
Original-Received: from thor.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.11])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 1713yZ-0002Ik-00; Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:33:19 -0400
Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by thor.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.54-GA)
	with ESMTP id ADA97737;
	Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:33:08 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: miles@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <buod6wo1jkc.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on 25 Apr 2002 13:36:03 +0900)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3293
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3293

> From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
> Date: 25 Apr 2002 13:36:03 +0900
> 
> I also added `buffers-menu-show-status' option, because I hate the way
> the menu looks when it shows modified/read-only status for buffers.

Wouldn't the buffer list look prettier if the modified/read-only
status were displayed to the left of the buffer names?  As of now, if
the status is displayed (which is the default), the % and * mnemonics
are not aligned.  I think if they were aligned at the left, it would
look better.