From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Have you all gone crazy? Was: On being web-friendly and why info must die Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 19:04:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <116f2308-1887-4d22-b8ef-b088007eab6d@default> References: << <87388bnzha.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87k31mdbhe.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tx0qiv45.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87h9wqd3i5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> >> <<<87fvc8kdsp.fsf@gnu.org> <6e11cd85-09a0-4b7a-baa2-0c810bdebbce@default> <871tnsg0w7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> >> <<<834msoqrsg.fsf@gnu.org> <87k31ki3tc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <21657.38692.813089.642641@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tx0j4tqo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87y4puad75.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> >> <<>> <> <> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419735888 29210 80.91.229.3 (28 Dec 2014 03:04:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 03:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: adatgyujto@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org, Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 28 04:04:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y549o-0004Gc-61 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 04:04:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57486 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y549n-0004PX-Dy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 22:04:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y549Z-0004LI-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 22:04:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y549W-0003nS-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 22:04:25 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:41029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y549W-0003nN-1H; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 22:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id sBS34H8j017538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 28 Dec 2014 03:04:18 GMT Original-Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBS34GkF003157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 28 Dec 2014 03:04:17 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0003.oracle.com (abhmp0003.oracle.com [141.146.116.9]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBS34Fur023142; Sun, 28 Dec 2014 03:04:15 GMT In-Reply-To: <> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8.2 (807160) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180736 Archived-At: > > > The reason I don't want to adopt this position is that it > > > implicitly assumes we should treat "use Google" as the > > > recommended solution. >=20 > > I'm guessing that your objection here is not to recommending web > > search but to recommending the use of Google. >=20 > I object to recommending web search as the primary way to find > documentation. I should have stated this more clearly but I already > said it a week ago. I see. Good.