From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Okamsn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding the `prescient` packages to NonGNU ELPA? Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 00:27:57 +0000 Message-ID: <11680a2c-b082-cfce-e075-9694ed06dae0@protonmail.com> References: <16193c73-ab80-04c9-558f-d5e6142f38f3@protonmail.com> <871qpydllo.fsf@posteo.net> <4a52210d-3e39-ed34-a7c9-c3ee6e2a7a68@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31065"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 04:21:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p2233-0007tX-Md for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 04:21:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p222H-0006gq-MK; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 22:20:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1zLH-0000O3-Lk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 19:28:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-4316.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.16]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1zLF-0003RL-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 19:28:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1670200086; x=1670459286; bh=hPiTF+elymSMA06ZP1Yw+lgoqLRnkWB7Z0OArEsCy2c=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=U5iZ1MfMmbwL0F4Rs7GvLimhEk02S3l0H/qgzabO5dJQYR6RByzPeakuzzk5+qp2+ qWgoAJBpJ1z6h6b+vp8pgGA3cclP9xveabvdRurjYytzQ3mQ1+frYCiCT1vt4A1aG/ ZO+gg0cCDP73mqsjXalXfk3Fxd0JE/cyMjm4STWy966FriGtdRayRZlDYkci1f0fhc Amcv2LnxLNdaKoSzD+gmHH9v6Ys7u4Xcdy82BKUhXVSkb6MzKaaIBke2esnS4G41RG 14pPFUXjHHnKgpnrMFdrG7P5a1kzrGeQLkQN2TxCSxoj6Ay6tRRJbsgk0ojSa3xQNK XBI0fT/nJTquw== In-Reply-To: <4a52210d-3e39-ed34-a7c9-c3ee6e2a7a68@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 25935600:user:proton Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.16; envelope-from=okamsn@protonmail.com; helo=mail-4316.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 22:20:48 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300915 Archived-At: On 2022-11-20 17:42 UTC, Okamsn wrote: >> >>> All of these packages live in the same repository in the link below. >> >> Would it be possible to change this? E.g. by making each project live >> on it's own branch. That would make the :ignored-files rules below a >> lot simpler. > > I wouldn't mind making new branches that hold the stable versions. Are > you OK with the README and CHANGELOG still being duplicated in that case? > > ... After communicating with the other maintainers, they are requesting that I do not make this change (discussion here: https://github.com/radian-software/prescient.el/issues/138). You mentioned that there are caveats for package-vc. If a user wanted to install a package using that feature (which I look forward to trying), is it possible to tell it the files that should be added (or not be added) to the load path? >>> When I tried testing the installation of `prescient`, it installed >>> an older version of the file `prescient.el` than what is current in the >>> repository. This was the version that received an update to the version >>> number, but how does the system decide which is the most recent stable >>> version of a file? I might need to increase the number to make it >>> install a newer version. >> >> Yes, ELPA finds the last commit that changed the version header and uses >> that to prepare a release. > > OK. I will try updating the version number to make sure that was the > problem. > This was the problem. The installation works after changing the version number. I have asked about the author's process for releasing a new minor version.