On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 17:22 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Could you describe much more precisely what you're doing (especially > how > you use the URL package: which functions of it you call, etc...). > Are you using WebDAV (i.e. url-dav.el)? I'm not using url-dav.el -- I'm using xml-rpc.el which I maintain. However, to eliminate the reliance on external code, I've pulled the bit from xml-rpc.el that makes the call to post to a weblog hosted on Blogger.com: (let ((url-debug t)) (setq url-request-data "blogger.newPost0123456789ABCDEF9380140usrnamepasswrdIñtërnâtiônàlizætiøn from emacs with patch1") (setq my-resp (unwind-protect (save-excursion (let ((url-working-buffer (get-buffer-create (xml-rpc-get-temp-buffer-name))) (url-request-method "POST") (url-request-coding-system 'utf-8) (url-http-attempt-keepalives nil) (url-request-extra-headers (list (cons "Content-Type" "text/xml; charset=utf-8")))) (set-buffer url-working-buffer) (let ((buffer (url-retrieve-synchronously "http://plant.blogger.com/api/RPC2")) result) (set-buffer buffer) (url-http-parse-headers) (if (> url-http-response-status 299) (error "Error during request: %s" url-http-response-status)) (url-extract-mime-headers) (setq result (xml-rpc-request-process-buffer buffer)) result)))))) Without the patch that I supplied, this results in a server error: "unexpected end of file found" With the patch, it works perfectly. The result can be seen at http://emacs-weblogger.blogspot.com/ (I originally used the LiveJournal platform, but decided it wasn't good enough for this demonstration since it uses Perl's SOAP::Lite which is very liberal in what it accepts. Blogger.com runs on Java and Java's static typing makes it stricter in what it will accept when it comes to XML-RPC types.) For purposes of this report, I've attached a .zip file with my a elisp snippets, a perl snippet and some packet traces of the working and non-working code. I've elided my username and password, but you'll be able to see that the server fails when I submit without the patch and succeeds when I submit with the patch. Further, the only differences in the packet traces are the way "Iñtërnâtiônàlizætiøn" is encoded and the Content-Length header. I'm fully prepared to admit that my patch only works in this case because of some fluke, but the fact is that url-http.el works with the patch and fails without it. I humbly ask your assistance in fixing url-http.el. -- http://mah.everybody.org/weblog/ GPG Fingerprint: 7E15 362D A32C DFAB E4D2 B37A 735E F10A 2DFC BFF5 More people are killed every year by pigs than by sharks, which shows you how good we are at evaluating risk. -- Bruce Schneier