From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Andre Spiegel <spiegel@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: patch for documentation about version control
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:36:35 +0100
Message-ID: <1100187395.3428.207.camel@localhost>
References: <ht2hdnz4ilm.fsf@seal.service.jet.msk.su>
	<87vfce289d.fsf@floss.red-bean.com>
	<jwvk6sun1ww.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<jkpt2mf58r.fsf@glug.org> <1100078556.3428.151.camel@localhost>
	<jkr7n14pu2.fsf@glug.org> <1100174117.3428.194.camel@localhost>
	<m1is8c1l0y.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100188509 16243 80.91.229.6 (11 Nov 2004 15:55:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:55:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 11 16:54:55 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CSH1Z-0005jf-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:38:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CSHA4-0006oO-JW
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:47:00 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CSH8m-00069N-MC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:45:41 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CSH8j-00067O-5n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:45:37 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSH8h-00067L-C3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:45:37 -0500
Original-Received: from [193.113.160.15] (helo=mail.o2.co.uk)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CSGzu-00036m-IH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:36:30 -0500
Original-Received: from [217.231.175.76] (217.231.175.76) by mail.o2.co.uk (7.0.028)
	(authenticated as andre.spiegel@o2online.de)
	id 4171E70400539AE0; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:37:48 +0000
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-Reply-To: <m1is8c1l0y.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29752
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29752

On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 10:11 -0500, Stefan wrote:

> Indeed, it would be better to do it directly as a patch to the RCS
> sources...

We definitely need to run performance tests.  If we get acceptable
performance, both time and memory-wise, even for large RCS files, I'd
say let's do it.  I'll try out TTN's revised patch and we'll see.