From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jerome.marant@free.fr: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:36:18 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <1096554978.415c19e265447@imp4-q.free.fr> References: <1096291271.415813c757a26@imp6-q.free.fr> <20040927134714.GA20012@fencepost> <87hdphx91c.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87655wswkv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <1096489325.415b196d95987@imp3-q.free.fr> <200409300053.i8U0rWh20758@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <01c4a6f7$Blat.v2.2.2$8c5c2b00@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096555021 12672 80.91.229.6 (30 Sep 2004 14:37:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rlb@defaultvalue.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 30 16:36:53 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CD23B-00061E-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:36:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD29Z-0008TO-6x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD29S-0008TJ-44 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:43:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CD29R-0008T7-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CD29R-0008T4-H2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.228.0.44] (helo=postfix3-1.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CD22d-0001bN-2K; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from imp4-q.free.fr (imp4-q.free.fr [212.27.42.4]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7950E1736AC; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:36:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by imp4-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 749ABF71B; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:36:18 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from mure.msy.sagem.com (mure.msy.sagem.com [62.160.59.178]) by imp4-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:36:18 +0200 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <01c4a6f7$Blat.v2.2.2$8c5c2b00@zahav.net.il> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 62.160.59.178 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27707 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27707 Quoting Eli Zaretskii : > Anyway, what's wrong with the current scheme that we need to abandon > it, and how does the suggested 3-component scheme improves that to a > degree that justifies additional work (to fix all those places that > will need fixing)? What scheme do you have in mind that won't clash with the current scheme, that is, changing bugfix versions separately from trunk versions? -- J=E9r=F4me Marant