From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: build from CVS Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 22:06:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1082-Thu07Feb2002220658+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <200202071458.g17Ew0P04737@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013113243 31924 195.204.10.66 (7 Feb 2002 20:20:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Feb 2002 20:20:43 GMT Cc: vardhan.v@parsectech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16Yv2B-0008Io-00 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 21:20:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16Yutw-0005AJ-00; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 15:12:12 -0500 Original-Received: from heimdall.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.17]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16YutR-00058w-00; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 15:11:41 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretsky (diup-221-79.inter.net.il [213.8.221.79]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BEV75074; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:11:19 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <200202071458.g17Ew0P04737@aztec.santafe.edu> (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:58:00 -0700 (MST)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:866 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:866 > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:58:00 -0700 (MST) > > Idea! We could put in an infinite sleep-loop. Then the make will not > get beyond that point. You'll have to use C-c to terminate it, > though. Does that seem unreasonable? To make C-c more reasonable, we could add an appropriate text before the sleep, telling the user to stop it with C-c. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel