From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Buesching Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: extensions for emacsclient (CVS version) Date: 12 Sep 2003 07:22:58 +0200 Organization: Universitaet Bremen Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <1063344177.1680.51.camel@rincewind> References: <20030910143748.GA27983@fencepost> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1063344306 8240 80.91.224.253 (12 Sep 2003 05:25:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 05:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 12 07:25:04 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19xgQa-0000dK-00 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:25:04 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19xgRi-0005d4-00 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:26:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19xgOm-0002i8-Aw for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19xgOf-0002gk-GJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19xgOc-0002g9-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.22) id 19xgOc-0002ft-Lw; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [134.102.224.4] (helo=imh.informatik.uni-bremen.de) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19xgOO-00038O-6G; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rincewind (adsl-9-206.nordcom.uni-bremen.de [134.102.9.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by imh.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8C5MdgO018405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:22:39 +0200 (MEST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:16319 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:16319 On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 01:47, Richard Stallman wrote: > I already modified your first patch to do part of the job right, > and I will install that. You've seen the patch I will install. > > Can you show me what *additional* patch is called for, and tell > me which parts of it were written by you and which by others? The last version of the patch contains my complete code plus about 11 lines from you. So now it's your decision what do as the maintainer of emacs. I'm prepared to sign the papers if required, but I can also life with it, if the patch is accepted without it. crunchy