unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stephan Stahl <stl@isogmbh.de>
Cc: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Idea for compilation mode
Date: Fri,  6 Jun 2003 14:01:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1054900912.3ee082b0b4f97@webmail.isogmbh.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x5d6hr1qoe.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>

David Kastrup <David.Kastrup@t-online.de> wrote:

> Stephan Stahl <stl@isogmbh.de> writes:
> 
> > If set-goal-column should be on a key maybe C-x , can be used. Thats
> > not far away from the old C-x C-n and C-x . which is directly beside
> > would be somehow similar in function (set-fill-prefix).  I think we
> > should stop soon or we'll end up remapping all keys :-).
> 
> Which would not be the worst thing.  As I said, it would be a viable
> task for the TODO list to go through the existing, historically grown
> keymappings with a fine comb, try to compare the probable usefulness
> of mappings with their mnemonic characteristics and their awkwardness
> (taking non-American keyboard layouts somewhat into mind as well) or

Taking non-American keyboard layouts into mind seems like a very complicated 
thing. I myself use a us-international layout because most others layouts i 
have tried are horrible to use with applications like emacs or maybe vi.
For example the german keyboard has not two alt keys but one alt and one altGr 
keys. To produce ] one would have to type altGr-9. It is not possible to type
C-] (aka ESC) on a german keyboard because it would require both ctrl and altGr 
to be pressed. At least i never found a keyboard / operating system where it is 
possible. Besides it would be very hard to hit all three keys at once.
I belive most other european keyboard layouts are somewhat similar in that 
aspect.

-- 
Stephan Stahl

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-06 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-27 22:41 Idea for compilation mode Richard Stallman
2003-06-03  7:42 ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-03  8:01   ` David Kastrup
2003-06-03 10:20     ` Miles Bader
2003-06-03 16:14       ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-06-03 12:11     ` Frank Schmitt
2003-06-03 11:24   ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-03 13:14     ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-03 13:42       ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-03 14:08         ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-03 14:16           ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-05  0:07           ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-05  0:07       ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-04  8:53   ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-04  9:37     ` Miles Bader
2003-06-04 10:23       ` David Kastrup
2003-06-04 10:27     ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-04 15:19       ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-05  6:25         ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-05 13:07           ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-05 13:31             ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-05 13:37           ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-05 14:00             ` Lute Kamstra
2003-06-05 23:02               ` Miles Bader
2003-06-05 23:08                 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-07 12:01           ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-05 10:57       ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-06  1:45         ` Miles Bader
2003-06-06  6:11           ` David Kastrup
2003-06-06  8:58           ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-06  9:49             ` David Kastrup
2003-06-06 12:01               ` Stephan Stahl [this message]
2003-06-06 12:41                 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-06 13:40                   ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-06 17:55                     ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-11  8:22                       ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-06 21:35                     ` Frank Schmitt
2003-06-08  1:09                   ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-08  2:38                     ` David Kastrup
2003-06-09 17:12                     ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-11  8:36                       ` Stephan Stahl
2003-06-11  8:51                         ` David Kastrup
2003-06-12  7:42                           ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-06 15:40                 ` David Kastrup
2003-06-06 16:49                   ` Stephan Stahl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1054900912.3ee082b0b4f97@webmail.isogmbh.de \
    --to=stl@isogmbh.de \
    --cc=miles@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).