From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ndame Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:35:07 +0000 Message-ID: <0mzQyNNOqiV3kryyvOKfFFXEongGNN6Yb6wh0uwKR3RTwNe7h7pzoXD5SjivycXj5xjqi_6Q-hwetC0bT_71sB4EDwfe7wolddSYoaDhVc8=@protonmail.com> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <835zdqc8ms.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="67508"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 23 21:35:59 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhdf-000HSu-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:35:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhde-0006BG-3N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:35:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhcy-0005FE-PY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhcy-0006me-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]:34101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhcw-0006di-0d; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:35:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1587670511; bh=fmZdp1RuxBgp5EHVDu3+z3MbC5SUZi/KV7vfYUFlYVQ=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Utv142t0eKB1qvjLcCeGftCGGxnq87Mfuj1xFMeS8y94/ksVboQ/u0Uwu7VyLquoV Qw8DhmoTvuQcMlePg/gZlk3+u9tDG1gImuMZXzRSlll6hPx0TaxMEbfxbiDP++DYWZ BJ+Qj7BnV64E1+/mMn8MOeTON+i1FciASEtIriVQ= In-Reply-To: <835zdqc8ms.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.27; envelope-from=ndame@protonmail.com; helo=mail4.protonmail.ch X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/23 15:35:11 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247620 Archived-At: > > > What about current popular packages outside Emacs? Were those developer= s > > all asked? > > Not all of them, but some were asked, yes. And in those cases what were the typical reasons given for refusals?