From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-state and unregistered Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:13:32 +0300 Message-ID: <0e890664-f04e-ff05-0503-02547a05fbf4@yandex.ru> References: <6ok2vyzwf9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <08f70cda-44be-0657-e50a-2b2c80d2c21c@yandex.ru> <87oa9dzgl0.fsf@gmx.de> <87potshczh.fsf@gmx.de> <87bn57otja.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <515b3451-820d-ad50-8c98-d0330a0f4266@yandex.ru> <87lh4arpbg.fsf@gmx.de> <87ega2rodp.fsf@gmx.de> <87vb37ury1.fsf@gmx.de> <87potfuqdt.fsf@gmx.de> <557a2987-39e8-051e-55fd-678bc01a6a40@yandex.ru> <87lh43upd9.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461503634 2034 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2016 13:13:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 13:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 15:13:54 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1auJrF-0006PN-St for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:13:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55383 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJrF-0005x9-52 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:13:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJqz-0005u7-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:13:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJqw-0000ji-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:13:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]:36087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJqw-0000j8-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id w143so14570309wmw.3 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 06:13:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vRk7RcRO7UVexWwUjkMwmf2Y6qnTGc8DqF2h1QDekVQ=; b=Xci6zecODRsxkDGgDRJW7rR4fMXuD14Uf1D2oSfR4q9yhXXSGklQ7wuzipor7ayh14 yx49POMRMvvXMlQ8X7PERj8Iy8wmQD+1EitzVHNwN/mlLoJW8tk8zaHRaLlushpZQPYc ItEJjOhxqmgqoVQiGHfoG2WvIuFHfu8KYClyQjkuEhwsvkvK5AaTHL90F2hMStxrM7BP KbHy1pQ5S5q8q8UMlQXxYeqbL6Y7C2WWAkQOWtJ3ECTIyflmnybmudj6Cn8FdIlEFSnH ux9NDUt9PDCfig8i7uYS7gXc6M3hU+fRyvcV1HGtDPByAFd5davRJknlYtiKsNExdCWf ekWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vRk7RcRO7UVexWwUjkMwmf2Y6qnTGc8DqF2h1QDekVQ=; b=ZLTrwFke1r7TSmfP6+mxHXisNbf8vLwEINXNmxq3QfIhXEBmg+HjFzshTVW+g+wTct 1gixvcodLYt/NeRPnZpfY+5PpYM1NUCDBqiM80q2Xtvf21djZOJ215nJKJaAPmrhV3Qb ++6Q+uQeje/qPMvO8T7Ldw2G6epcxE0eeU0JBzASrRBoMn54M5OnKmnYhBPXoTdkQC6E jkveAwaaDU1SSi5mOvT7nU+W+K5wybvcRfl1EBEvaCO0eTrotvlzF/2sonyjaxhqeI+a C47MCQpkf4XwWv4T0aBnvWzk5TqlNpEWhZWS4hUwU/FAehZViXZLvzLupSZTj36ZTXWz HTMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWzTWrqy2Zig2i8a5+YdlAmVzmftQLyVSbzQb7woNgcectrsWMgGyF4C7GskNMlCQ== X-Received: by 10.194.144.10 with SMTP id si10mr28830679wjb.180.1461503613830; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 06:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a200sm6790927wme.8.2016.04.24.06.13.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Apr 2016 06:13:33 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <87lh43upd9.fsf@gmx.de> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::243 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203251 Archived-At: On 04/24/2016 04:07 PM, Michael Albinus wrote: >> When does it return `unregistered'? > > See my recent commit. Could you put that into words? >> Just nil, obviously. > > That's not what's specified. Please re-read my previous messages. >> What about my changes? > > I have applied some of them. I have not applied the reversion of calling > vc-responsible-backend instead of vc-backend, because I'm not convinced > yet that this is proper. I don't have to convince you. Quote the opposite, see "lisp/vc/*" in admin/MAINTAINERS. Or do you want to take over VC maintenance? > vc-state returns unregistered now in most of the cases when it should, > as it is specified. Pls show me the bugs, I might have introduced. We've discussed your current code at length already. It's pretty much what was in emacs-25 previously, with some new additions (those I don't mind, so far). > And yes, I have ackmnowledged already that we must speak about performance. And yet, you've decided to disregard the previous messages on that subject.