Re: master 00149f18ea9: Support modifying VC change comments for Git

[Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>]

Hi!

On 23/10/2024 12:47, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Wed 23 Oct 2024 at 12:17pm +03, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
>> The values of the new option vc-allow-rewriting-published-history
>> could have their mnemonic value improved (and also become more
>> consistent with our practices elsewhere), if they were changed as
>> follows:
>>
>>    nil (default): don't allow
>>    ask: ask whether to allow
>>    t: allow without asking
>>
>> The current values, where t means "ask for confirmation" and 'no-ask'
>> allows without asking is IMO sub-optimal, because t usually means in
>> Emacs "do something unconditionally".
>>
>> So I suggest to change the values as described above.
> `ask' is nicer than `no-ask', indeed.  I am however keen to steer people
> towards `ask'.  In addition to t often meaning "do something
> conditionally", it often means "turn this on in the most common way"
> even if the most common way is not the most permissive way.
> 
> I would be grateful for more opinions on how this option should look.
> CCing Dmitry.

I think I prefer Eli's suggestion, simply because it is more 
straightforward and has precedent. The more exotic schemes we have 
somewhere are probably due to history, where a new possibility had been 
added to an existing option, and the decision was to retain the current 
behavior by default.

If we want to steer towards "ask", changing the default would probably 
be the most efficient approach.