From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master updated (4b1ab18391 -> 8517d1e9aa) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:45:56 +0200 Message-ID: <0E5842F6-384C-4AAC-ADBD-D56D54BA5917@acm.org> References: <166067551220.16571.3552675760321814129@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13208"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 14:03:45 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOHlx-0003EP-MC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:03:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOHlw-0008WL-57 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOHUx-0002gW-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:46:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail171c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.181]:45830 helo=mail92c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOHUr-00016K-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:46:10 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1660736759; bh=G8mqqxYHvkUwfg0rayJ3dlmNujV2pvV7edkdqFuDWDw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=KMMEXE2Aso6FtJgWb8hOIpm6TO9BR0+xbaVuh4aS2pBsb5ghnSvJf29YFDNNmuIGd B2XFtDozvFxEc808gr/b0dLqRw+1mCUMpGwpbZ4rh1W7b1CHvpqgeYVS4gZSaJ3d8M Tx8j0iGScSMQ++fy5c7usSKB68rqRy0hzd+kWYfA= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c188-150.188-179.bredband.tele2.se [188.150.188.179] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail92c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 27HBjuRn028655; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 11:45:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F23.62FCD4F7.0045, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.10.181; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail92c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293547 Archived-At: 17 aug. 2022 kl. 13.13 skrev Stefan Kangas : > The above seems to lead some warnings that, at a glance, I wasn't > immediately sure weren't false positives They either indicate actual bugs or minor inefficiencies, and can all = easily be dealt with. I usually prefer letting those most familiar with the code, typically = the authors or maintainers, to fix warnings for several reasons. In = particular they are more likely to rectify underlying errors instead of = just 'fixing the warning', and may know about similarly flawed code that = wasn't warned about. If the warning indicated a misunderstanding of how = the language or system works, he or she will also have an opportunity to = learn. This doesn't mean I won't help if asked, very much the contrary! (As you can see, several of the warnings are duplicated; that's an old = problem that should probably be fixed one day.)