From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unboxed package manager Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:56 +0000 Message-ID: <08b5f766dd0f765bb1a9@heytings.org> References: <57668895-8EEA-44F7-BD46-9CDFAA11FD2C@gmail.com> <08b5f766ddd9da754a86@heytings.org> <08b5f766ddf4b33993cd@heytings.org> <08b5f766dd896dfbed4c@heytings.org> <83jzza6xwk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9871"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: owinebar@gmail.com, casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 21 14:34:48 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pec8V-0002Kh-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:34:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pec7m-0006df-QQ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pec7l-0006aQ-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pec7j-00060U-Ny; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:34:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1679405637; bh=CQJ6yET1grNo/1Z1GfUXfPj+PU2UiMZRswIQ6MjW1pI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=SDm5HobYYirGo/eouSpsafUZAPArkRMvU2yqHJKj7kcQeeMIu+XDazqhOBpcHZhe7 sbPt4uhf/ZWFKSvm+yffxHS3jmHt0+oeGU5oVD4M2vhQvqHqravkKCgK5hJSeljYVh WBcXhy+f0y6dsm7AZ3lteRHsh0rO9Cd5osvLSZqoFk91kjIfXHcCL9K9Not8ZLVBKQ dzCvmk8UU6Xm4ntsIUV7Mr9EmJTaJlENYRZKG11JS3SsnlvIFdi42nEGadBM/SrzQG ShkgrTrTMYs0pzvr83Pw/pf2wmlH/SGPdZipPA9bL5vZ9ZUTKTcK/d5jpbx/Nb6uZ2 aHmXQl7qcKiPQ== In-Reply-To: <83jzza6xwk.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304649 Archived-At: >>> You could construct a test without external packages by just >>> generating N directories, prepending them to the load path, then doing >>> the same loadall to see if the degradation is purely due to the size >>> of the load path. >> >> Indeed, with the attached file, emacs -Q -l loadall.el takes 120 >> seconds. Hmmm... > > Why are you surprised? Having 2000 directories in your load-path is a > bad idea regardless. > I'm not surprised, but I wonder whether it's possible to do better.