Re: recent changes to org files

[Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>]

On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:59 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Your words don't match your proposed way of working.  Emacs
> maintainance quite often means bulk changes: new interfaces and
> semantics are introduced, and things like the multitty changes and the
> unicode changes necessitate global work (as do added bytecompiler
> warnings).  It is not feasible to do the update work only after
> figuring out prospective maintainers for every file.  The only hope to
> get things like this done is to do the changes and let the maintainers
> check for them.  And merge time is certainly an important point of
> time for checking it (though regularly checking for diffs in that area
> is not amiss either for a maintainer actually interested in his code).
>
> If your workflow does not permit fixes to be applied to Emacs CVS, the
> only sane solution short of adjusting your workflow is to remove
> org-mode from Emacs CVS.  Only in that manner can it be assured that
> bug fixes and interface changes and other things can actually persist.

Well, don't turn my words in my mouth.  I believe so far I have been  
constructive in
this discussion and so have you.  Let's keep it that way.

-- Carsten