From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should (buffer-list) ever return killed buffers? Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 08:49:40 +0200 Message-ID: <026ac84e-003a-5993-9ea0-6c05c4852736@gmx.at> References: <87wnrpujo0.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <87bl91uhn0.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <9b005615-9b52-cc9c-e620-bc87334f08e0@gmx.at> <87v977swqf.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sergey Organov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 25 08:51:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llQuI-0008u5-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 08:51:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50056 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llQuH-00024p-OO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 02:51:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llQsw-0001JH-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 02:49:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:38113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llQst-0003mO-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 02:49:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1621925382; bh=/2O0Mqk7DT0O3Ptmocx9pDryFAkSBhvk6MOS5nTiI3c=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZLDS8mHKGoJx+o8kC9/SOi/vlasmLNpkzlKMnRQfx0T/UbNG6UVa6XRZO6SWaqtt5 KGJpEDK8d6f/erBB3sveS1BpaKDisvRQTGreYyYIVZQPcpOro9KvH0e8ebl5iwWiNS L5+LJja85tYLKAOyMBZ69FAQ2To2zkuAZwWfN6EM= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.142.96.13]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MpDJX-1l5E7e3Eq7-00qhr1; Tue, 25 May 2021 08:49:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v977swqf.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:rAgeHL76Z5I1iw88jmbZ4lrWRqiCiHGa5bWPyXVH9djLK6ouss5 L6cEy53ISyNkoYAAbP7mALgoz/h+Z8ACnKaU2vkkuTh2+iYAKIwztXIez3+lLoOS4M29caR 7P2RAzY23hcotQ+yDFL2cBL/vO48KBgTeD4gZbAVDsceofGjDEecJK0v0kD2pVEoNm4n6/3 OlxU2ZZ3Cq1VpsJbaPWUQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:arXryyAuOWk=:K6zqEhaBpbxMPueTepBP/y WVz5bGdVDE6voXDjrPgK5rPMtdIZ4bW7XCD5c29Fg4PsGejBWlgkXQUIK/1v9F8vAk529EdIs 3zQlbbjZdPOeN/w6hiWiGrewkj4LayXIm7aLOl04ej39bG4Jr0Bwi+ACVVv8qCioUbdMVA2Y8 I3NX9Qpc96AMjV8fHL5iWTxDF30V0dFPv9OFdUtYKfRG4VSsDsl/HeORqwBrfIdFmKaJaAvCX vxj4TAvrmjj1RPPORYBRXd2KGiPHxCgim29mc05SdEyMOOG6ijivq/YgFkfRZNxT3MQH2FB9s 5ekqQyKkU/gWJZ+ywl83JOW1el00W5c5aLBIgk6vLwQuS6g/zUtzU4DMQebQw6n8sxj8XH2AD 743ItQeh0+eR2y7xBVkkhPMSkH+IyhTcr8EwsCPwvBP1yfP3ebcGOcm3SnZ/9b/5LRDK3sBCm Y59MR0kWwGwk52XK4wFBDpOjDkmduHzxVmpTWpkD2bHNZrNzktqVisbZN3yA9O+golrevwFzI L21NF/UWYd4bvAAUy/BgDnoX83o9MJZwZ/QXlNceo5vcBp94wS8F2/h3FGh6jyAjEfrPOvOYl YGc3160lFQasmEFfpL7mm3/2oMRnN0IPGTFPst7jXTKRGkzI7M36jIXUO/5gacNhLmtvOlIq4 VkcXpQWlV58oYe9fNXR5EOV44Gnryt+1M039G9GS1+mUlHAFWAN1sG6EnPjZJJJSxbu9Q6XQi pBZKDB7emFFgmRTlywyF5tSuniYXZ5hN22Emeof/lTgazggMP6Tgi5dlC+RczJ4oZ5mca6NP Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=rudalics@gmx.at; helo=mout.gmx.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269837 Archived-At: > Overall, buffer-list doesn't seem to be guilty in this particular case. > It's desktop-clear that is buggy. I just checked that it indeed chokes > every time there is an indirect buffer in the buffer list after its > base buffer. Well, then ... `kill-buffer' kills all indirect buffers whose base buffer it kills. martin