From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ben Wing" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: RE: Permission to use portions of the recent GNU Emacs Manual Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:32:45 -0700 Message-ID: <01e001c4e594$8cf2a810$0300a8c0@neeeeeee2> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103438110 15815 80.91.229.6 (19 Dec 2004 06:35:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bob@rattlesnake.com, stephen@xemacs.org, andy@xemacs.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 19 07:34:30 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cfudy-0003E2-00 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 07:34:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CfuoC-0007fw-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CfunX-0007S1-6U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CfunU-0007QC-Re for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CfunU-0007Q9-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [68.230.240.31] (helo=lakermmtao08.cox.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cfuce-0000MM-6f; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:32:52 -0500 Original-Received: from neeeeeee2 ([68.0.135.100]) by lakermmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20041219063250.KZNH16610.lakermmtao08.cox.net@neeeeeee2>; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:32:50 -0500 Original-To: , X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31262 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:17499 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31262 > (2) Richard mentioned that the what he object to is blanket changes. > Perhaps there could be a mechanism by which xemacs=20 > requests license > flexibility for each bit of the manual text it wants to=20 > use; if the FSF > gave timely responses to such request, it might be only a minor > inconvenience. [I have no idea what exactly is=20 > acceptable to the FSF > but ...] Richard, under what circumstances would you accept or refuse such a = request?