From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Ben Wing" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: RE: Permission to use portions of the recent GNU Emacs Manual Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:31:42 -0700 Message-ID: <01df01c4e594$67a42e30$0300a8c0@neeeeeee2> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103438133 15841 80.91.229.6 (19 Dec 2004 06:35:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 06:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bob@rattlesnake.com, stephen@xemacs.org, andy@xemacs.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 19 07:34:53 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CfueM-0003EM-00 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 07:34:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cfuoa-0007oE-6p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CfunX-0007Sl-Jo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CfunW-0007Qv-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CfunV-0007Q9-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:44:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [68.230.240.34] (helo=lakermmtao05.cox.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cfubh-0008Un-AT; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:31:53 -0500 Original-Received: from neeeeeee2 ([68.0.135.100]) by lakermmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20041219063148.GJPU16431.lakermmtao05.cox.net@neeeeeee2>; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 01:31:48 -0500 Original-To: , X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31263 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:17500 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31263 > (1) Xemacs could use this opportunity to try to get its > records in order > and try to identify what parts of its manual are > problematic etc. I thought it has abundantly been explained why this is not possible even if we wanted to do so -- we don't consider our records out of order.