From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Naming FCRs Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:38:35 -0800 Message-ID: <01d516b3-86ca-fdf3-73f0-49b2e6930499@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15979"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 27 05:39:26 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n1hnC-0003wD-2P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 05:39:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50708 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1hnA-00069j-U3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 23:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1hmR-0004y0-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 23:38:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::634] (port=40613 helo=mail-pl1-x634.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1hmQ-0006Vh-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 23:38:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id v19so10635167plo.7 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:38:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bbb29djfkcdgAyJJv6oyB5uBFDJyPUIux4LnCvl3Pf0=; b=n6qPIDA1CFtM7ibfql6IuJXDj6WfQNvgzC0U3nJDBAkVDI20RTsQoL3AcEWGJsXnks Rh67UgiwVhEW0beTXtK941CPo9KsxNNAlqTBhDEwUoAOtkgOONQkA3mYD0RHe6TlTjxS y/MmMuVHHm0QhkGYudOMpvUVMOROKBnMvUEtBslMvZWCl5AY0vgjoHu8hjnt1Xa6g1Xk HlQ9JWt9l4XrxgM5aPe0titkDluW2hrVwzxlrsQUXT9FcHoRwKH9pJBdhShWrJVnVMNg 1oGIO4E+uAmvbrq50NK8vyK4kB7+COvd9ugutvL291LhSptEN1BXqrRoN8ikJRZd4aW3 YEQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bbb29djfkcdgAyJJv6oyB5uBFDJyPUIux4LnCvl3Pf0=; b=OykfUHMo4PR2EWtGxJwlwwWUPU2iDL8i9SlTKsol/uQzrMryDllnlR3gIOve5/LEv5 wQTDL/XA+KL/ytBuEI0Q1gY25K83VWaQgC+IrTrdkvLPxxzXbzpyjjSJiNwnBVnWj77A DWXPULq39tZOX5SZ6lsHNx3QTaRkvdA0TV/Yvu4AcvxdSux4h9lj27T+TFvQo7kAX57d fV84ar40UV1x0fhlAxBLE3oqoYMjuBbH2OlkNkB0xHr1vm3sms6UwVyAjJ0zOFNANwLM P6i12WlZtkX45AltoXWKrIRTYcyQ1BVk3zTb0UHsn+ZloU4J6Z37WQUn9jORKWaMeo1C M6NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532f/GIke1Csv7y2u4q492EpgVQxsffWPgbWA9YKpISdKPLJAGAx vcSqkp+A0gW2XDsWqHKyK4vzC0Zoluk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYQd9xvsViGAGcS0/X+klVRp/vMNRYHmt8TVIlbd1Pt03kFVpa39kQFJKUkBUeDFf34tRR3w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8006:: with SMTP id b6mr7300043pjn.214.1640579916086; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:38:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f14sm15964090pfv.215.2021.12.26.20.38.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:38:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::634 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::634; envelope-from=jporterbugs@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x634.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283392 Archived-At: On 12/26/2021 2:04 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > - Monomaniac objects (since they're a bit like OO-style objects but > limited to have only exactly one method). Perhaps "function object"? Usually, a function object is a callable entity that has state associated with it. On the other hand, the "associated state" is fuzzy enough that a reader might think "function object" includes closures, since those contain state too. Maybe that's ok, or maybe that's confusing; I guess it depends on how (if at all) FunCallableRecords relate to closures. > A good name would ideally come with a fun abbreviation. > Feel free to send me your ideas, Or how about a "structured function", since it's a function with some additional structure, i.e. the record slots? A "strunction"? Ok, maybe that last one leans a little too far towards "fun" and not enough towards "comprehensible"... - Jim