From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap fails on w32 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 06:51:31 +0300 Message-ID: <01c55f4a$Blat.v2.4$da4fab00@zahav.net.il> References: <428FB183.3000209@student.lu.se> <4290EDA8.7020401@student.lu.se> <85psvjyli5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85acmmlwqc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116820567 27211 80.91.229.2 (23 May 2005 03:56:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 03:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 23 05:56:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Da42q-0001Wb-3m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2005 05:56:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Da46D-0005Nl-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 23:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Da45L-00056e-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 23:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Da45K-00056G-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 23:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Da45K-000566-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2005 23:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Da4B8-0001wv-Si; Mon, 23 May 2005 00:04:35 -0400 Original-Received: from romy.inter.net.il (romy.inter.net.il [192.114.186.66]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id GUL34486; Mon, 23 May 2005 06:55:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-46-70.inter.net.il [80.230.46.70]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id BHQ17764 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 23 May 2005 06:55:01 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: David Kastrup X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: <85acmmlwqc.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 23 May 2005 00:30:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37497 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37497 > From: David Kastrup > Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 00:30:35 +0200 > Cc: Lennart Borgman , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > So the Windows release contains mostly non-DOS line ends? Yes. > Is that a good idea? I don't see anything wrong with it. Emacs certainly doesn't have any problems with Unix EOLs, and most modern development tools don't have such problems either.