From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlay arrow in *compilation* and *grep* buffers Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 10:17:22 +0300 Message-ID: <01c55855$Blat.v2.4$1e630f00@zahav.net.il> References: <01c548ba$Blat.v2.4$e4827900@zahav.net.il> <01c54909$Blat.v2.4$070f3e60@zahav.net.il> <01c54c2b$Blat.v2.4$e15e8560@zahav.net.il> <17009.19855.763603.487800@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c54c8a$Blat.v2.4$6afa17e0@zahav.net.il> <17009.62951.957607.360268@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <87oebkw22l.fsf@jurta.org> <17027.16429.215672.493633@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <87is1nlnt1.fsf@jurta.org> <01c55782$Blat.v2.4$4616ee00@zahav.net.il> <17028.21709.35999.263715@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c557bf$Blat.v2.4$d25541e0@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116056639 27756 80.91.229.2 (14 May 2005 07:43:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 07:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 14 09:43:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrJK-0004TS-TF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 09:43:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrKu-0004hP-PL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:45:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrFV-0000FV-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrCt-0007lf-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWrCm-0007fE-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DWr52-0000oD-7n; Sat, 14 May 2005 03:29:00 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-254-105.inter.net.il [83.130.254.105]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id BFI41504 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 14 May 2005 10:21:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 13 May 2005 20:26:10 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37115 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37115 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: nickrob@snap.net.nz, juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 20:26:10 -0400 > > Now is the right time to make some kinds of changes, those that correct > annoyances and wrinkles in the features we have added. We clearly disagree on this. I think that this is precisely the reason why today, months since feature freeze, we have a less stable Emacs than we had then.