From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /lib/cpp not found in c-mode Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 23:58:56 +0300 Message-ID: <01c550ec$Blat.v2.4$3b8fa220@zahav.net.il> References: <17013.26868.207510.370151@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17013.52411.51878.781739@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17014.39042.74353.677362@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <01c55014$Blat.v2.4$59df46a0@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115252216 32120 80.91.229.2 (5 May 2005 00:16:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 00:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 05 02:16:54 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DTU2Z-0002jU-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 02:16:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DTU9z-0007yK-6j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 20:24:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DTR1T-0001aj-DH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 17:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DTR1R-0001Zd-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 17:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DTR1R-0001YY-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 17:03:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DTR4u-0007kC-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 17:06:44 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-9-69.inter.net.il [80.230.9.69]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EHI29305 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 5 May 2005 00:01:16 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Stefan Monnier X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 03 May 2005 16:23:40 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36678 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36678 > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 16:23:40 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > ??? Isn't it a simple matter of looking at the Makefile and passing > > the relevant switches to the preprocessor? If the Makefile is too > > complex to figure out the switches, I usually invoke "make foo.o" to > > see what switches it uses, then copy them into the c-macro-expand's > > prompt for arguments. > > Seems like much too much trouble compared to the functionality offered, Not when you really need it, like when a complicated macro causes some bug or compiler message you cannot figure out.