From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlay arrow in *compilation* and *grep* buffers Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:08:40 +0300 Message-ID: <01c54c8a$Blat.v2.4$6afa17e0@zahav.net.il> References: <01c548ba$Blat.v2.4$e4827900@zahav.net.il> <01c54909$Blat.v2.4$070f3e60@zahav.net.il> <01c54c2b$Blat.v2.4$e15e8560@zahav.net.il> <17009.19855.763603.487800@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114758606 14992 80.91.229.2 (29 Apr 2005 07:10:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 09:10:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DRPd2-0007Ak-Nv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:09:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DRPjK-00084t-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DRPj2-000837-1O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:15:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DRPj0-00082q-DD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DRPj0-00082l-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:15:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DRPi9-0008GF-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:14:53 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-65-115.inter.net.il [80.230.65.115]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EGH55610 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:10:19 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Nick Roberts X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: <17009.19855.763603.487800@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:54:39 +1200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36494 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36494 > From: Nick Roberts > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:54:39 +1200 > Cc: juri@jurta.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > (unless (display-graphic-p) > > > (put 'next-error-overlay-arrow-position 'overlay-arrow-string "")) > > > > Wouldn't this affect Edebug on text terminals? > > No, I don't think so. The thread that was hardly a discussion was about > conflicts and covered this. The changes that ensued meant that Edebug and Gnus > still use the global variable overlay-arrow-position while compile.el and > gud.el have their own overlay arrow, following Kim's earlier work to allow > multiple overlay arrows. So, if the next-error-overlay-arrow-position's string doesn't affect anything but compile.el, how come text terminals started to display the arrow as result of a discussion about GUD and Edebug? What am I missing?