From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-n is very slow in Font-Lock mode Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:57:15 +0300 Message-ID: <01c54b0f$Blat.v2.4$a313bea0@zahav.net.il> References: <01c54841$Blat.v2.4$8f503680@zahav.net.il> <01c54917$Blat.v2.4$b975aea0@zahav.net.il> <85r7gxkf3r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114596608 25203 80.91.229.2 (27 Apr 2005 10:10:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 12:10:06 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQjTs-0007oT-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:09:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQjZl-0006EU-3Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DQjTJ-0004is-0i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:08:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DQjTF-0004hS-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQjTE-0003pV-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DQjNh-0001nn-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:02:57 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-41-251.inter.net.il [80.230.41.251]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id BBW11388 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:58:56 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36442 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36442 > From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) > Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:59:39 +0200 > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > The code has used vertical-motion since CVS revision 1.1 (Dec. 1991), > and I don't see anything relevant in the older ChangeLogs, so who knows? "cvs annotate" tells more; see my other message in this thread. I found that ChangeLog entry using annotate's information.