From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze (was Re: font-lock-comment-delimiter-face) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:56:10 +0300 Message-ID: <01c54918$Blat.v2.4$92270280@zahav.net.il> References: <8ebr83q5rw.fsf_-_@xpc14.ast.cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114379710 14286 80.91.229.2 (24 Apr 2005 21:55:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gmorris+emacs@ast.cam.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 23:55:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPp3x-0004Bl-Dm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:54:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPp9M-0000S4-0c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPp7q-0008JM-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:58:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPp7p-0008Iz-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:58:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPp7p-0006gY-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:58:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DPpA3-0007Vd-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:01:07 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-58-44.inter.net.il [80.230.58.44]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id BBK60223 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:57:33 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: ttn@glug.org X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: (message from Thien-Thi Nguyen on Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:46:40 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36348 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36348 > From: Thien-Thi Nguyen > Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 17:46:40 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:27:47 +0100 > > 2) should there be a new CVS branch for the release? > > that depends on the precise release methodology, which hasn't been > captured under admin/ or admin/notes/, as far as i can tell. FWIW, previous practice was to cut the branch after the pretest was over, i.e. immediately before releasing a new version.