From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fontification of citations in mail-Mode Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:55:25 +0300 Message-ID: <01c545c9$Blat.v2.4$e4bd9560@zahav.net.il> References: <20050418110346.GD4768@kenny.sha-bang.local> <20050419074527.GA4860@kenny.sha-bang.local> <01c54515$Blat.v2.4$9123cf00@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114016453 6946 80.91.229.2 (20 Apr 2005 17:00:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 20 19:00:43 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOIYM-0000iR-U5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:59:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOIct-0000CW-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:04:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DOIcg-0000CQ-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DOIce-0000CE-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DOIce-0008My-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:04:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DOIbY-0001sl-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-84-228-238-98.inter.net.il [84.228.238.98]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EFB30135 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:00:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36173 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36173 > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:04:58 +0200 > > > Failing that, here's a suggestion for a more complicated solution: > > define special faces for Mail mode, so that they could be customized > > without affecting general-purpose faces such as comment face. > > Message mode already has numerous faces to play with... > > I fail to see the rationale for extending mail-mode, when we > already have another mode that DTRT... The rationale is that I don't think we should deprecate modes that still work well and are maintained. > Would (defalias 'mail-mode 'message-mode) work? I don't know, but I'm quite sure now is not the time for such changes.