From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: face colors on 256 colors terminals Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:54:52 +0300 Message-ID: <01c53c29$Blat.v2.4$89c45bc0@zahav.net.il> References: <200504060817.j368HDAH019106@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <01c53acd$Blat.v2.4$7c0f2080@zahav.net.il> <200504062134.j36LY8AH022227@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <01c53b25$Blat.v2.4$80e8db20@zahav.net.il> <200504071827.j37IRdAH006473@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112958065 11736 80.91.229.2 (8 Apr 2005 11:01:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 08 13:01:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJrED-00017A-Su for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:00:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJqni-00017A-4Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:33:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJqkp-0000Xh-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:30:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJqki-0000Wn-HT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:30:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJqke-0000Vo-Nj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:30:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJrDT-0003xA-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 06:59:59 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-244-206.inter.net.il [83.130.244.206]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id AYA22164 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:59:04 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Dan Nicolaescu X-Mailer: emacs 22.0.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: <200504071827.j37IRdAH006473@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:27:36 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35753 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35753 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 11:27:36 -0700 > > > So I think we should change this patch so as not to change the color > > definitions on displays that support less than 88 colors. That is, in > > those cases where there's a single color definition, split it into 2 > > and change only the one for >88 colors. > > OK, I did this, except for a few faces that are supposed to stand out > by design, for those using the brighter colors seemed more appropriate > for 16-colore terminals too. These faces are: custom-invalid-face > trailing-whitespace, c-invalid-face-name, whitespace-highlight-face. Fair enough. I took a look at the patches, and they seem okay to me. Thanks.