From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: defface doc misses default and some more errors Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:53:27 +0200 Message-ID: <01c50f2c$Blat.v2.4$9af43340@zahav.net.il> References: <002101c50e75$33ee87c0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <01c50ed6$Blat.v2.4$5fc89be0@zahav.net.il> <00a101c50ee2$f91a8630$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108012255 9861 80.91.229.2 (10 Feb 2005 05:10:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 05:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 10 06:10:54 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz6bH-0006YC-QF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:10:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz6px-0003B9-3B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:25:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz6pN-0002vw-GE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:25:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz6pH-0002tg-NQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:25:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cz6pF-0002o4-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cz6QY-0001IL-Bi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:59:42 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (tony04-57-217.inter.net.il [80.230.57.217]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id DST59850 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:59:39 +0200 (IST) Original-To: "Lennart Borgman" X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: <00a101c50ee2$f91a8630$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> (lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33172 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33172 > From: "Lennart Borgman" > Cc: > Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:06:18 +0100 > > Thanks, you are right. I just copied that part. Hm. I just read the > semantics so to say. What about the semantic error which I was pointing out? The previous wording was inaccurate, but yours is also inaccurate (or perhaps simply unclear). I think we need a better wording. > BTW I think the dividing between Info and the doc strings is a bit > problematic. Why? I think the philosophy is that the doc strings are a short version of the documentation, and the manual is the full version. I don't see any problem in such subdivision.