From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: strange emacs 21.4 on ftp.gnu.org:/pub/gnu/emacs Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:24:58 +0200 Message-ID: <01c50d53$Blat.v2.4$3d003e80@zahav.net.il> References: <73766b120502070245671f77ee@mail.gmail.com> <87brawmmzp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107808662 31251 80.91.229.2 (7 Feb 2005 20:37:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 07 21:37:41 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyFdY-0003c4-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 21:37:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyFrj-00061s-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:52:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyFjx-0001Bq-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:44:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyFjv-0001At-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:44:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyFju-0001AJ-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:44:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyFWZ-00075J-4K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (tony04-57-217.inter.net.il [80.230.57.217]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id AMM85519 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:30:05 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.4 In-reply-to: <87brawmmzp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:05:32 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33042 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33042 > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 10:05:32 -0500 > Cc: Juan LEON Lahoz Garcia , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Am I the only one who finds himself very much surprised that even though > he's a fairly active contributor and reads emacs-devel, emacs-pretest-bug, > gnu.emacs.help, gnus.emacs.bug, gnu.emacs.announce, and a few more places, > he has not seen any announcement (let alone discussion) of this new release? I'm not surprised: it takes time for the announcement to get from Richard's mail to gnu.org servers and from there to propagate to the news groups. On top of that, gnu.emacs.announce was in the past known to have problems with announcements. By contrast, a file upload to ftp.gnu.org is instanteneous, and also is generally done _before_ the announcement goes out.