From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ispell-region with M-$ in transient-mark-mode Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:46:16 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4fde1$Blat.v2.2.2$f4f851c0@zahav.net.il> References: <87zmz7m2qr.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4fd95$Blat.v2.2.2$b13f8120@zahav.net.il> <87651u6w4g.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1106112396 10716 80.91.229.6 (19 Jan 2005 05:26:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 05:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: k.stevens@ieee.org, ispell-el-bugs@itcorp.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 19 06:26:22 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cr8MI-0004Wo-00 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:26:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cr8YE-00014W-PP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:38:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cr8Qo-0008WE-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cr8Qa-0008Qc-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:30:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cr8Qa-0008JK-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:30:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cr7n7-0001Rg-Lp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.146.250]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id DOH40944 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 06:49:56 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Juri Linkov X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <87651u6w4g.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:33:19 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32363 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32363 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, k.stevens@ieee.org, > ispell-el-bugs@itcorp.com > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:33:19 +0200 > > > I don't like such a reinterpretation of a word-related command: it's > > counterintuitive. It is okay to do that with commands that by default > > work on the whole buffer, but not with commands that work on a word. > > It's very intuitive to work on the active region when the user has > explicitly selected it in Transient Mark mode. Yes. But word commands are IMHO not the ones that should be sensitive to active region. > I suggested to add this to `ispell-word' because M-$ is only one > keybinding available to active ispell. If that's the main reason, let's have a key binding for ispell-region. (Of course, you can always bind it yourself if this is so important for you.)