From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-trunk-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/faces.el Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:45:26 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4ed61$Blat.v2.2.2$5c4edf60@zahav.net.il> References: <87mzwsws3d.fsf@jurta.org> <41B6317B.6020303@esperanto.org> <41BC0D29.9020007@t-online.de> <87sm5wfhh3.fsf@jurta.org> <87ekhcsurb.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ebea$Blat.v2.2.2$4d937300@zahav.net.il> <87r7lbikl4.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec5f$Blat.v2.2.2$d17a06a0@zahav.net.il> <87fz1r9j5x.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec98$Blat.v2.2.2$7de106e0@zahav.net.il> <87k6r3ynqg.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ed1d$Blat.v2.2.2$0c9a74a0@zahav.net.il> <871xda6jha.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104295883 7328 80.91.229.6 (29 Dec 2004 04:51:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 04:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 29 05:51:17 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CjVnp-00060s-00 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 05:51:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjVyh-0007bx-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CjVy6-0007Xp-8F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:01:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CjVy5-0007W1-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:01:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjVy4-0007VG-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:01:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CjVl4-0001MU-CE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:48:26 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (tony06-81-83.inter.net.il [80.230.81.83]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DKL33139 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:47:00 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Juri Linkov X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <871xda6jha.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:22:57 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31565 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31565 > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 02:22:57 +0200 > Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > >> > I think blue and green do not stand out on 8-color terminals as much > >> > as the red color. > >> > >> Blue and green are no less noticeable than red. > > > > They are noticable, but less annoying. > > If you say that red is more annoying, then I agree. And I don't like > that comments are highlighted in red. But when ^L will be highlighted > in red too, then it will be less noticeable since it will look like comment. We've made a full circle: I already said that comments _should_ stick out, since they've been fontified in reddish color since day one. By contrast, people do not want ^L to stand out like comments do.