From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-trunk-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/faces.el Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:36:20 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4ed1d$Blat.v2.2.2$0c9a74a0@zahav.net.il> References: <87mzwsws3d.fsf@jurta.org> <41B6317B.6020303@esperanto.org> <41BC0D29.9020007@t-online.de> <87sm5wfhh3.fsf@jurta.org> <87ekhcsurb.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ebea$Blat.v2.2.2$4d937300@zahav.net.il> <87r7lbikl4.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec5f$Blat.v2.2.2$d17a06a0@zahav.net.il> <87fz1r9j5x.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec98$Blat.v2.2.2$7de106e0@zahav.net.il> <87k6r3ynqg.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104266367 16925 80.91.229.6 (28 Dec 2004 20:39:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 21:39:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CjO7j-0006Wm-00 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:39:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjOIb-0006gt-Lp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:50:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CjOIA-0006fE-Kh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CjOI6-0006dx-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CjOI6-0006de-8g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.66] (helo=romy.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CjO6m-0007sx-LL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:38:20 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (tony06-81-83.inter.net.il [80.230.81.83]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id ADT91935 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:37:59 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Juri Linkov X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <87k6r3ynqg.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:52:19 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31541 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31541 > Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:52:19 +0200 > > >> But there is no color for 8-color terminals which does not stand out. > > > > I think blue and green do not stand out on 8-color terminals as much > > as the red color. > > Blue and green are no less noticeable than red. They are noticable, but less annoying. > > Also note that the way you defined the face, 16-color terminals will > > also use red, although there are some more colors there that do not > > stand out. In fact, any terminal with fewer than 88 colors will use > > red. > > There are no too much colors among 16 colors to select from. > Brightred is even worse than red. I was thinking about brown or lightblue, not the reddish ones.