From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Frame background mode Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 06:49:53 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4ec98$Blat.v2.2.2$d1967860@zahav.net.il> References: <877jn4suf5.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ebea$Blat.v2.2.2$db76ff20@zahav.net.il> <87y8fjcxbn.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ec60$Blat.v2.2.2$ed1f8d20@zahav.net.il> <87acrz83cp.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104209518 29262 80.91.229.6 (28 Dec 2004 04:51:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 04:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 05:51:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cj9Kn-00026x-00 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 05:51:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9Vc-0003NZ-HA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9VS-0003MO-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9VR-0003LQ-Ov for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9VR-0003LG-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9Ka-0004yb-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:51:37 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-227-59.inter.net.il [83.130.227.59]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DKI29319 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 06:51:33 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Juri Linkov X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <87acrz83cp.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 28 Dec 2004 04:48:06 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31508 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31508 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 04:48:06 +0200 > > The original suggestion was to change the formula for computing > conditions (background light) and (background dark) which will > affect most current faces. > > The suggestion above affects none of the current faces and will be > applied for faces that will take advantage of the new `min-background' > keyword. If the idea is to add the `min-background' keyword to most of the faces, the effect will be the same, right?