From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Frame background mode Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:09:46 +0200 Message-ID: <01c4ec60$Blat.v2.2.2$ed1f8d20@zahav.net.il> References: <877jn4suf5.fsf@jurta.org> <01c4ebea$Blat.v2.2.2$db76ff20@zahav.net.il> <87y8fjcxbn.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104185667 6362 80.91.229.6 (27 Dec 2004 22:14:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 27 23:14:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cj387-00042E-00 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:14:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj3Iv-0007rX-WF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:25:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj3In-0007rE-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:25:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj3Im-0007qe-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj3Im-0007qb-8g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.24] (helo=legolas.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj35O-0005jY-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (IGLD-83-130-227-59.inter.net.il [83.130.227.59]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id DKH81841 (AUTH halo1); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:11:25 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Juri Linkov X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2 In-reply-to: <87y8fjcxbn.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:15:08 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31480 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31480 > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:15:08 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > The new formula will affect only users who have background color set > to one of 98 colors I listed in the previous message. 98 colors is not a small number. > No color customization needs to be reworked. The only change needed > for users affected by the new formula is to customize frame-background-mode > user option. If they can figure out that this is what they need to do, yes. I suspect most users will not know that, and instead will go and change colors right away. > If even such small change is undesirable I don't know if it is undesirable, but Emacs did use the current recipe since about day one. > then maybe it's better to > leave the old formula alone, and to add a new condition keyword > (e.g. `min-background') that will specify the minimum color intensity > (a fraction between 0 and 1) and will use the new formula, for instance: > > ((class color) (min-colors 88) (min-background 0.5)) I'm probably missing something, because I don't see how is this different from your original suggestion.